Gentoo Archives: gentoo-scm

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, gentoo-scm <gentoo-scm@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo git workflows and the stabilization/keywording process
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:56:28
Message-Id: 20140922085604.62c82c3e@pomiot.lan
In Reply to: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo git workflows and the stabilization/keywording process by Peter Stuge
1 Dnia 2014-09-21, o godz. 23:36:58
2 Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> napisał(a):
3
4 > Jonathan Callen wrote:
5 > > the correct response would be to ensure that the final commit
6 > > pushed (whether it be a merge commit or rebased) contains the
7 > > stabilization for both arches
8 >
9 > I think this is one of the things to check in a post-receive or
10 > post-update hook. What is the easiest way to access keywords out of
11 > an ebuild - which does *not* require sourcing the ebuild in a shell?
12
13 How can we distinguish between accidental and intentional stable
14 keyword removals? :) However, this could probably go as part of atomic
15 change policy -- you can't stabilize and de-stabilize in one commit.
16
17 --
18 Best regards,
19 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature