1 |
On 20-04-2010 00:16:33 +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
2 |
> >> Well, you are indeed right that the switch should be performed |
3 |
> >> on a better fine-tuned basis as with the current solution, developers |
4 |
> >> would have to manually trick portage into generating full Manifests for |
5 |
> >> their current GIT repositories. |
6 |
> >> |
7 |
> >> Have you got any suggestions regarding the filename? |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > 'thin_manifest' to enable usage of the DIST-only Manifest entries? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Let's not add another one-time file for such changes. |
12 |
> There was a talk sometime ago with Brian and Zac about adding a new file |
13 |
> to repos to list the features they support - the manifest type could be |
14 |
> one feature in that file. |
15 |
|
16 |
Sounds good to me. |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Fabian Groffen |
21 |
Gentoo on a different level |