1 |
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 08:58:49AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> > Do we really want users to continue using rsync? Isn't git pull so |
3 |
> > much faster? What's the downside of users using git directly? |
4 |
> ehm, that you need git? that you need to use git to get information |
5 |
> about changes? that you need a whole new infrastructure of mirrors to |
6 |
> get it running (vs the rsync infrastructure)? that you need at minimum |
7 |
> 800MiB to be able to look at some history, iso. 286MiB as the rsync tree |
8 |
> is now? |
9 |
That's not a valid size comparison, see my previous email. |
10 |
|
11 |
> Besides from that git doesn't even work on all platforms, but I can |
12 |
> imagine you don't care about that. |
13 |
Very valid as well. |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
18 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
19 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
20 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |