Gentoo Archives: gentoo-scm

From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
To: Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@×××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-scm@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-scm] 'overlays' are altenatives to full tree clone
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:45:22
Message-Id: 20090417174523.GA4195@comet
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-scm] 'overlays' are altenatives to full tree clone by Caleb Cushing
1 On 21:41 Thu 16 Apr , Caleb Cushing wrote:
2 > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
3 > >
4 > > Justin Lecher wrote up quick instructions about this, to preserve
5 > > history when merging from the sci overlay to the main tree. I don't know
6 > > if it's anywhere besides my inbox
7 >
8 > history is preserved via merges.
9
10 I'm pretty sure we all know that. The comparison though is to the
11 current case, where you just copy files across. A simple merge works
12 great if your overlay is a copy of the entire tree plus a few commits,
13 and you want the entire history of changes to every package merged
14 across. I suspect the more common case is a small overlay with no shared
15 ancestry, where you only want to merge in commits to a single package.
16
17 --
18 Thanks,
19 Donnie
20
21 Donnie Berkholz
22 Developer, Gentoo Linux
23 Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-scm] 'overlays' are altenatives to full tree clone Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com>