From: | Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-scm@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-scm] meeting followup: repo layout | ||
Date: | Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:44:19 | ||
Message-Id: | AANLkTimSjm2u=e_bxzNX5UevQe2DWMEsPSL_-FfoHnhT@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-scm] meeting followup: repo layout by "Robin H. Johnson" |
1 | On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:34, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
2 | > For comparison, what would the overhead costs of hg be above? |
3 | |
4 | Mercurial would be about O(f + d + 10r). But wouldn't the real git |
5 | inode space be O(35r) directly after repacking, but grow O(rev) until |
6 | the next repack? |
7 | |
8 | Cheers, |
9 | |
10 | Dirkjan |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-scm] meeting followup: repo layout | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> |