Gentoo Archives: gentoo-scm

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-scm@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-scm] Splitting gentoo-x86 repository for easier consumption
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:29:14
Message-Id: 20090411T172723Z@curie.orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-scm] Splitting gentoo-x86 repository for easier consumption by Caleb Cushing
1 On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:57:54PM -0400, Caleb Cushing wrote:
2 > > As cutting history have already been proposed here and received with mixed
3 > > opinions
4 > I'd like to to suggest removing manifests from the history, and only
5 > include 'dist only' once it's possible.
6 He already included the slim Manifests in his list of items.
7
8 > and if it ever comes to it that we can switch to git completely
9 > changelogs as well, and that silly cvs line. all of these generate way
10 > to much unneeded data that cruft up the repository.
11 This one will not come to pass I think. The CVS commit message is NOT
12 the same as the ChangeLog entry. The ChangeLog entry is for user
13 consumption, the commit message is for developers.
14
15 --
16 Robin Hugh Johnson
17 Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy
18 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
19 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-scm] Splitting gentoo-x86 repository for easier consumption Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@×××××.com>