1 |
W.Kenworthy wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>Is there a bug number that references this? The older 0.2.0 works OK. |
4 |
>Despite the big warning that this is experimental, the fact that it |
5 |
>works reasonably well makes it indispensable for those who are trying to |
6 |
>run reasonably secure systems - what other distro offers similar |
7 |
>functionality? One place/utility for this was a great idea! |
8 |
> |
9 |
>I saw the kernel stuff and still think this approach is short sighted, |
10 |
>and potentially leaves users exposed. |
11 |
> |
12 |
>BillK |
13 |
> |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
Does anyone have a link to the no kernel GLSA news? |
17 |
FYI I use "glsa-check -t new" and it works great for me. |
18 |
|
19 |
>On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 07:16 -0500, Brian G. Peterson wrote: |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
>>On Tuesday 20 September 2005 06:09 am, Calum wrote: |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>>>I prefer the idea that tracking one source (GLSAs) would provide me with |
26 |
>>> |
27 |
>>> |
28 |
> |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |