Archives
Archives
| From: | Jeff Smelser <tradergt@×××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-security@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-security] gpg signing in portage. Can we use it yet? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 08 Nov 2004 16:45:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200411081042.44119.tradergt@smelser.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-security] gpg signing in portage. Can we use it yet? by Anthony Metcalf |
||
| 1 | On Monday 08 November 2004 10:26 am, Anthony Metcalf wrote: |
| 2 | > On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:23:50 +0100 |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > helge preuss <scout@×××××××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 5 | > > Anyway, thanks for finding the right procedure and sharing it. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > That's what lunchtimes are for. :) |
| 8 | |
| 9 | There some reason your signature is always bad? Can you fix it plz? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Jeff |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-security] gpg signing in portage. Can we use it yet? | Anthony Metcalf <anthony.metcalf@×××××××××××.cx> |