| 1 |
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 03:49:54AM +0100, Peter Simons wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dan, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> you forgot to reply to this paragraph of my message: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > But I, at least, find it useful to know that spending a |
| 7 |
> > couple of hours implementing an insanely simple procedure |
| 8 |
> > that would prevent the insignificant number of, say, 10 |
| 9 |
> > people having their machines compromised -- machines with |
| 10 |
> > all their personal data, e-mails, love letters, income tax |
| 11 |
> > declarations, health records, etc. -- is not a priority. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I will reply, and I am sorry I forgot to reply before! |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
While I do not run business systems on it currently, I fully |
| 16 |
trust my personal data with Gentoo. Furthermore, I am more |
| 17 |
inclined to trust Gentoo dev's time and complexity estimates |
| 18 |
than your own. I do hope this issue is resolved in a timely |
| 19 |
manner, I don't feel your thread has contributed positively |
| 20 |
towards an eventual resolution. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
That is all. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
/--------------- - - - - - - |
| 26 |
| Dan Noe, freelance hacker |
| 27 |
| http://isomerica.net/ |
Archives