Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Simons <simons@××××.to> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-security@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-security] Re: No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?) | ||
| Date: | Mon, 08 Nov 2004 01:19:01 | ||
| Message-Id: | 87r7n5qgt2.fsf@peti.cryp.to | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-security] Re: No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?) by Anthony Gorecki |
||
| 1 | Anthony Gorecki writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Not to mention wireless data injection attacks, for |
| 4 | > anyone running a wireless connection on their system. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | And let's not forget the added bonus that because Gentoo |
| 7 | builds everything from the source code, the attack is |
| 8 | completely platform independent and works nicely on x86, |
| 9 | AMD, PowerPC, and whatnot else. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Great job. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Peter |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-security] Re: No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?) | Jake Hawkes <jake@×××××××××××××××.net> |