Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Gentoo TOTALLY secure now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Locke]

Yes i know this, but i don't like the very degrading mails and arrogant 
behaviour of Peter.
I think an md5sum and a signature for the whole portage package is enough in 
thought of integrity between Gentoo Servers and the local user. even though 
it has very few load on the servers.

cu, Locke

Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2004 19:33 schrieb BlinkEye:
> Sorry to add my 2 cents, but Kurt, i think you overread the comment that
>
> Peter was referring to:
> >why do you extract all files in the tar archive? >it doesn't make sense
>
> at all,
>
> > you can sign und hash the tar as it is, no security will be gained by
> > extracting the whole archive thats crap like your script.
> > only performance will be worse.
>
> which was made by: Locke <riphack@×××.de>
>
> i don't want to flame, that's why i'm just about to write a mail to
> Locke privately. but you mustn't shut up because another shouted at you.
> i don't see why Peter should accept insults. i thought this was a
> SECURITY list!
>
> regards
> blinkeye
>
> On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 19:10, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 06:54:50PM +0100 or thereabouts, Peter Simons
wrote:
> > > Honestly, people are you trying to look like complete idiots
> > > in a public forum on purpose or what?
> >
> > Peter -- I don't think there is any solution here that is going to make
> > you happy.  You don't like the suggestion I made.  I'm not willing to
> > implement the suggestion you made.  That leaves us at an impasse.
> >
> > If posting something about this issue to some other list will make you
> > feel better, then please do that.  If you feel you need to use another
> > distribution to ensure the integrity of your own machines, then please do
> > that.
> >
> > Whatever you do, please stop flaming, attacking and degrading the people
> > of this list.  Enough is enough.
> >
> > --kurt
>
> --
> gentoo-security@g.o mailing list

--
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list