1 |
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:06:15 -0400, Brian G. Peterson |
2 |
<brian@×××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Monday 09 October 2006 13:37, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: |
5 |
>> Given my lack of expertise, I'll work on a patch later, and in the |
6 |
>> short term I'll automate the momentary use of the dhcpcd client in a |
7 |
>> hardened jail to negotiate a connection; then record that information; |
8 |
>> then terminate dhcpcd; then use the recorded info and ifconfig or |
9 |
>> iproute2 to create a direct connection. A script or little C program. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Why not just use one of the other clients? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> pump drops privs |
14 |
> |
15 |
> udhcp drops privs |
16 |
> |
17 |
> it looks like dhclient can be configured to drop privs |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Why go throught the trouble to use dhcpcd? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Regards, |
22 |
> |
23 |
> - Brian |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
Thanks for the follow up. I was following this page : |
27 |
|
28 |
<http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?style=printable&part=4&chap=3#doc_chap3> |
29 |
|
30 |
which describes pump as "No longer maintained upstream, unreliable, |
31 |
especially over modems, cannot get NIS servers from DHCP", |
32 |
describes udhcp as "Unproven - no distro uses it by default, cannot define |
33 |
a timeout beyond 3 seconds ", |
34 |
describes dhclient as "Configuration is overly complex, software is quite |
35 |
bloated .........", |
36 |
and (IIUC) recommends dhcpcd ("the longtime Gentoo default") over the |
37 |
other alternatives. |
38 |
|
39 |
Perhaps this handbook is out of date (unfortunately, the individual Gentoo |
40 |
handbook pages have no dates)? |
41 |
|
42 |
Would certainly appreciate a contemporary recommendation. :-) (I'll be |
43 |
googling about looking for info on these other clients) |
44 |
|
45 |
Thanks! |
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |