| 1 |
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:03:07 +0000 |
| 2 |
Antoine Martin <antoine@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I think someone already tried it on this list, a few minutes IIRC. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
real 10m39.694s |
| 7 |
user 1m11.500s |
| 8 |
sys 2m5.833s |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
That would make my emerge sync 1/3 longer, and create: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 nevyn users 7.6M Nov 10 14:51 portage_md5_sums.txt |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That is just to create the hashes, and that 7.6M file would have to be added to the portage tree. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
*That* isn't even the point though. The point is the work that would have to be done by the devs on a range of systems, and the increased load that would be put on the servers. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
You think it would be worth it to have the "band-aid" in a few weeks and the compleate fix in 6 months? I'd rather wait for the compleate fix in the knowledge that I am getting the best alternative sooner. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Let us agree to disagree, after the dev's have made there choice as is their perogative. |
Archives