| 1 |
the key word being discussion. So we have peters fix. are there any |
| 2 |
others? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Kurt can you clarify this for me or give me more detail... on what you |
| 5 |
mean what you say below? What is the more robust solution? I dont recall |
| 6 |
reading it here? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
"The solution that Peter is requesting (generating hashes of files not |
| 9 |
already hashed and then signing all Manifests/hashes) is considerably more |
| 10 |
risky and is not something I will implement since we have a more robust, |
| 11 |
better solution in the works already." |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Thanks |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
----- Original Message ----- |
| 16 |
From: "Jeff Smelser" <tradergt@×××××××.org> |
| 17 |
To: <gentoo-security@l.g.o> |
| 18 |
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 12:55 PM |
| 19 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Maybe a new approach? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Archives