| 1 |
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:33:42 +0200 |
| 2 |
Klaus Wagner <klaus@××××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > # /emerge/.profile |
| 6 |
> > if [ "`echo " $(who) "|grep "^\ $(whoami)\ "`" != "" ]; then |
| 7 |
> > echo "Only login via 'su' permitted." >&2 |
| 8 |
> > exit 1 |
| 9 |
> > fi |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Hi, |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> keep in mind that if emerge user has write access to it's homedir |
| 15 |
> (which is quite normal and needed by much applikations) the emerge |
| 16 |
> user could easily change (replace) it's own .profile even if it has no write |
| 17 |
> permissions to it. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Not if it's chown'ed root:portage and chmod'ed 440 |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> In my opinion sudo with a limited set of commands would be a more |
| 22 |
> appropiate way to solve this and gives good logging if you want to know what has happened |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I agree with that. But it's not part of the discussion how the 'admin' |
| 25 |
or 'emerge' user commands can be limited or logged. It solves the problem. |
| 26 |
Btw: The user 'emerge' has to sudo, still. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> mfg klaus |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Archives