Archives
Archives
| From: | Graham Murray <graham@×××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-security@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Kernel Security Update Target Delay? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 17 Oct 2010 19:05:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 871v7oabp2.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Kernel Security Update Target Delay? by Alex Legler |
||
| 1 | Alex Legler <a3li@g.o> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > As the maintainers are primarily responsible for providing unaffected |
| 4 | > ebuilds, you'll need to ask the kernel team for exact reasons. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | In all of this we must bear in mind that the kernel team is one of the |
| 7 | fastest to respond to upstream changes, at least with ~arch. New |
| 8 | vanilla-sources are normally in the tree within hours of upstream |
| 9 | releasing them and gentoo-sources are seldom far behind. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Kernel Security Update Target Delay? | Aaron Bauman <bauman.aaron@×××××.com> |