Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Rui Covelo <rpfc@××××××××××××.pt>
To: Chris Frey <cdfrey@×××××××××.ca>
Cc: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Re: Is anybody else worried about this?
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 17:05:23
Message-Id: 418E559D.1090104@mega.ist.utl.pt
In Reply to: [gentoo-security] Re: Re: Is anybody else worried about this? by Chris Frey
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 | So is the solution. It was posted a few messages back. We just need some
5 | admin to drop a find script on the main server and setup the required
6 | keys. Once the signatures are there, anyone can write the userland script
7 | to do the verification, but until then, there's no point to write it since
8 | the server implementation is not known.
9 |
10 | - Chris
11
12 Read Peter's message moments after sending mine.
13
14 I like Peter's idea. But the question is still, where to keep the public
15 key and private key. Yes, maybe it's better to trust the developers than
16 any mirror admin.
17
18 Adding to what Peter said, what about having the public and private key
19 changed periodicaly (developers come and go, keys should come and go
20 too) and have the portage download automaticaly the public key and
21 revokation certificates when needed from a single server? Ex: www.gentoo.org
22
23
24
25
26 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
27 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
28 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
29
30 iD8DBQFBjlWbfLPhlaxNQk0RAqfZAJsGaLid/8BzfXhQVbsNlLDKgfaUbQCggsW7
31 kc2rYAq3W0CdOCTgDYcQ0jQ=
32 =GziW
33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
34
35 --
36 gentoo-security@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-security] Re: Re: Re: Is anybody else worried about this? Chris Frey <cdfrey@×××××××××.ca>
[gentoo-security] Re: Is anybody else worried about this? Peter Simons <simons@××××.to>