| 1 |
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:31:24PM -0500 or thereabouts, Chris Frey wrote: |
| 2 |
> Why? The patch Peter posted looked pretty straightforward. It's even simpler |
| 3 |
> than I thought it would have to be. I don't understand why it won't work. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Peter has indicated that signed snapshots will not be sufficient to |
| 6 |
mitigate this risk in his eyes. He is still demanding that another |
| 7 |
solution be implemented. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> If it is server load, it is my understanding that this script only runs maybe |
| 10 |
> twice a day. Is that correct? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
The signed snapshots script actually only runs once a day. There is no |
| 13 |
concern that it will add too much load. There is only a question on what |
| 14 |
Peter feels will be "enough". |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
--kurt |
Archives