Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Yury German <BlueKnight@××××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Soliciting feedback for the GLSA-2 format
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 02:43:35
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] Soliciting feedback for the GLSA-2 format by Tobias Heinlein
1 That is the part that would be the most important, as the XML makes sense to me. The translation from XML to GLSA would be the most important part so that it is clear to the general populace.
3 Whenever I write things for work I am always using the rule of writing to the least common denominator, and I can see this part being the most confusing.
5 Yury German
6 E-Mail: BlueKnight@××××××××××××××××.com
8 PGP/GPG ID: 19EC14B3
12 On Jan 9, 2014, at 8:35 PM, Tobias Heinlein <keytoaster@g.o> wrote:
14 > On 10.01.2014 00:37, Yury German wrote:
15 >> is this what the users will see as generated from XML?
16 >
17 > That was just a short example explaining the semantics of the new syntax.
18 >
19 > We haven't discussed yet how it'll show up in the text advisory, probably something like "Slot 3.2: <3.2.1 >3.4.2".
20 >
21 >


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature