From: | Chris Frey <cdfrey@×××××××××.ca> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-security@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-security] Re: Trojan for Gentoo, part 2 | ||
Date: | Sun, 07 Nov 2004 00:31:51 | ||
Message-Id: | 20041106193125.A24826@netdirect.ca | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-security] Trojan for Gentoo, part 2 by Alexander Holler |
1 | On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 09:16:11PM +0100, Alexander Holler wrote: |
2 | > Hi, |
3 | > |
4 | > after 1.5 years (2 years after the bug could could found in bugzilla) it |
5 | > seems that one of the highest security risks is closed. At least I've |
6 | |
7 | 1.5 years is a long time to figure out how to sign an ebuild. It puzzles |
8 | me that there is such resistence to these security steps, and not just |
9 | in Gentoo. |
10 | |
11 | Maybe in 1.5 years checking signed ebuilds will be the rule instead of |
12 | the exception. :-) |
13 | |
14 | Thanks for the reminder Alexander. |
15 | |
16 | - Chris |
17 | |
18 | |
19 | -- |
20 | gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-security] help blocking automated ssh scanning attack script | "Brian G. Peterson" <brian@×××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Trojan for Gentoo, part 2 | Jason Rojas <jason@×××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Trojan for Gentoo, part 2 | Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o> |