1 |
revdep-rebuild 'sounds' nice, yet it appears to scan ALL files on ALL of |
2 |
my mounts. Shouldn't it only scan files that were installed as part of |
3 |
gentoo packages? |
4 |
|
5 |
I ran this on an NFS server, hosting files for other machines, and it |
6 |
uselessly was checking files that had nothing to do with the gentoo |
7 |
install on the server. It appears to use find to locate files, it really |
8 |
should only scan files that were installed from packages. |
9 |
|
10 |
- Rod |
11 |
|
12 |
-- |
13 |
___ ____ ___ _ ___ |
14 |
Rod Moffitt / _ \/ __ \/ _ \ (_)__ / _/__ |
15 |
http://rod.info / , _/ /_/ / // / / / _ \/ _/ _ \ |
16 |
rodANTISPAM@×××.info /_/|_|\____/____(*)_/_//_/_/ \___/ |
17 |
======================================================= |
18 |
~ Where loved ones are remembered http://memoriam.org ~ |
19 |
|
20 |
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Mateusz Neumann wrote: |
21 |
|
22 |
> W li?cie z czw, 18-03-2004, godz. 12:33, Anthony Metcalf pisze: |
23 |
> > > I think that it's not necessary if those applications were compiled |
24 |
> > > with dynamic linking. So most applications don't need to be |
25 |
> > > recompiled. |
26 |
> > > |
27 |
> > I would have thought this was the case. If it is not, could someone |
28 |
> > explain why? |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > > Btw. how to determine which applications are compiled against openssl? |
31 |
> > > And which applications are linked statically and which dynamically |
32 |
> > > with openssl? |
33 |
> > > |
34 |
> |
35 |
> revdep-rebuild --soname libssl.so.0.9.6 |
36 |
> revdep-rebuild --soname libssl.so.0.9.7 |
37 |
> |
38 |
> .m |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
> -- |
42 |
> gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |