Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-security] [Fwd: Re: [gentoo-hardened] grsecurity in trouble]
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 19:09:06
Message-Id: 1086116849.15856.3280.camel@simple
1 -----Forwarded Message-----
2 From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
3 To: Aiko Barz <aiko@××××××.de>
4 Cc: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o, grsecurity@××××××××××.net
5 Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] grsecurity in trouble
6 Date: 01 Jun 2004 13:29:24 -0400
7
8 On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 11:46, Aiko Barz wrote:
9 > Read http://www.grsecurity.org/
10
11 You can show your support by sending the project donations. He is a
12 student and a sponsor that had previously made arraignments to help him
13 out was unable to fulfill a previous commitment. This now forces him to
14 go out and get a job. Going to school fulltime and working a job will
15 leave him little to no to develop grsecurity any farther. While we can
16 try to limp along and maintain the code for a while. We "won't" be able
17 to deal with the complexities of the rbac system without somebody like
18 spender driving. This means that the acl/rbac system will die just as it
19 was so nearing completion. So feel free to show your love and support
20 out of the pockets of your IT budgets so the grsecurity project can
21 remain alive and active. Nobody should have to barrow money just to eat.
22
23 >
24 > Bis denne,
25 > Aiko
26 --
27 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
28 Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-security] broken pstree Dadi <thewalrus@××××××××××××××.org>