| 1 |
Devon <devon@×××××.org> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Perhaps I am missing something obvious, but how do others rehashing prior |
| 4 |
> research make one not want to publish their new original research? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
It goes unnoticed the first time, so no countermeasures are |
| 7 |
implemented. The second time, there is a media frenzy, with rather |
| 8 |
aimless reconfiguring etc. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
However, I'm sure that most of this rediscovery is truly indepedent. |
| 11 |
So holding back the information doesn't help much. But the situation |
| 12 |
is surely frustrating. If you don't present your discovery as the end |
| 13 |
of the Net as we know it, hardly anyone will listen. If you |
| 14 |
exaggerate a bit, things go out quickly out of control. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the |
| 18 |
following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, postino.it, tiscali.co.uk, |
| 19 |
tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Archives