| 1 |
On Monday 23 August 2004 11:33 am, Calum wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 23 August 2004 16:27, you wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > Are there any plans to bring all this into the 2.6 kernels, or is the |
| 4 |
> > > move towards SELinux? |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Try hardened-dev-sources - they contain GRSecurity and PaX, and are |
| 7 |
> > well-maintained. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Thanks for that - not sure why I didn't notice that. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> But as a general feeling, do people feel that SELinux will become the |
| 12 |
> hardening method of choice? I.e. If I have to make a choice and commit now, |
| 13 |
> shall I stick with GRSec, or start looking at SE? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
there doesnt seem to be any push to go just one way or the other |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
grsec wont be back in gentoo-dev-sources ... too much of a hassle to maintain |
| 18 |
the patchsets (apply cleanly) and too many users didnt RTFM and started |
| 19 |
wasting gentoo and upstream developer time ... |
| 20 |
so now grsec is part of hardened and grsec sources |
| 21 |
-mike |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Archives