| 1 |
Video and sensor logs are definitely great when available, but there are |
| 2 |
plenty of companies without such precautions, besides the home user who |
| 3 |
seldom has them. It is tricky to seal/mark a case in some way that an |
| 4 |
intruder could not falsify. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I agree both of these are good measures, but neither amounts to |
| 7 |
verifying the physical security of the hardware. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
~RMC |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Oliver Schad wrote: |
| 12 |
> Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 16:20 schrieb mir Richard M. Conlan: |
| 13 |
>> And how does one realistically check the physical integrity of their |
| 14 |
>> hardware? o_O That seems a herculean task for all but the most |
| 15 |
>> hardcore computer engineer. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Every computer centre has a alarm system for physical intruders - a |
| 18 |
> check of videos and sensor logs can give you surety. You can mark your |
| 19 |
> hardware additionally with - I don't know the english word - signs(?) |
| 20 |
> which breaks if someone manpipulates your hardware. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Regards |
| 23 |
> Oli |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Archives