Archives
Archives
| From: | Joel Osburn <tjeckleberg@××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | 'Jeremy Huddleston' <eradicator@g.o>, gentoo-security@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | RE: [gentoo-security] Do I need to rebuild things afterupgradingssl? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:40:26 | ||
| Message-Id: | 011b01c40d18$6daf07a0$010000c0@JOEL | ||
| In Reply to: | RE: [gentoo-security] Do I need to rebuild things after upgradingssl? by Jeremy Huddleston |
||
| 1 | Thanks. I wasn't really confused by the version number differences, but |
| 2 | maybe someone else was. I was trying to point out that revdep-rebuild |
| 3 | claims to check for dynamically linked binaries, and the packages that |
| 4 | own them don't actually need to be recompiled to use the newer (minor |
| 5 | version) package. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | My question remains: how does one tell what packages are statically |
| 8 | compiled against a given library. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -Joel Osburn |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| RE: [gentoo-security] Do I need to rebuild things afterupgradingssl? | Jeremy Huddleston <eradicator@g.o> |