1 |
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 12:01:14 +0000 |
2 |
Pedro Venda <pjvenda@××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> |
5 |
> the same happens to me. I haven't given it much importance because ntpd works |
6 |
> ok even with grsec interference. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> > What is wrong here? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> still I'd also like to clarify this. |
11 |
|
12 |
I think this locking is done in order to ensure that ntpd is able to |
13 |
adjust time even under heavy load. |
14 |
|
15 |
So, if ntpd can't lock itself into memory, time-keeping might become |
16 |
inaccurate when ntpd is paged out on a loaded system. |
17 |
|
18 |
Regards |
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |