Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Christophe Garault <christophe@×××××××.org>
To: Calum <gentoo-security@××××××××××××.uk>
Cc: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Additional vulnerability in SAMBA <=3.0.7
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:51:26
Message-Id: 4198A62F.5040206@garault.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] Additional vulnerability in SAMBA <=3.0.7 by Calum
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Calum a écrit :
5
6 | Hello list,
7 |
8 | Is it me, or does it just seem like there are lots of bugs, vulns,
9 | and problems with Samba 3.x?
10 |
11 | I would have preferred to stay with 2 (having no need for the extra
12 | features of 3), but the ebuilds dried up a while ago.
13 |
14 This is one of my main question before having Gentoo on my servers.
15 What is the lifetime of ebuilds? Will I still be able to maintain PHP4
16 in two years, or will I have to upgrade to PHP5 even if I don't want
17 new features?
18
19 - --
20 Christophe Garault
21 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
22 Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
23 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
24
25 iD8DBQFBmKYvJ5Nh3YMYAQsRApi4AJ9sIb2PAO4IwCCHBIJvB5iDF2e4egCfUGc0
26 yOUXIprhrcBqJMlJYxcNesM=
27 =cT3x
28 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
29
30
31 --
32 gentoo-security@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-security] Additional vulnerability in SAMBA <=3.0.7 Calum <gentoo-security@××××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-security] Additional vulnerability in SAMBA <=3.0.7 Aaron Walker <ka0ttic@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-security] Additional vulnerability in SAMBA <=3.0.7 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <jaervosz@g.o>