Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Calum <gentoo-security@××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Out of air
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:05:19
Message-Id: 200411101404.45169.gentoo-security@umtstrial.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Out of air by Antoine Martin
1 This *is* dragging on a bit.
2
3 Can we all agree on one thing?
4
5 That Gentoo devs signing their ebuilds with individual keys would at least
6 make it possible to develop a framework that could take use of that, whatever
7 form that framework takes?
8
9
10 Key distribution, and key verification aside, at least signing ebuilds would
11 help, and couldn't possible hinder?
12
13
14 --
15
16 Random russian saying: Working sweat spices your food.
17
18 jabber: jcalum@××××××××××××.uk
19 pgp: http://gk.umtstrial.co.uk/~calum/keys.php
20 Linux 2.6.7-hardened-r7 14:02:22 up 52 days, 3:06, 1 user, load average: 2.44,
21 2.44, 2.12
22
23 --
24 gentoo-security@g.o mailing list