Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Chris Reffett <creffett@g.o>
To: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] Soliciting feedback for the GLSA-2 format
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:09:15
Message-Id: 52CDE86F.1080109@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] Soliciting feedback for the GLSA-2 format by Tobias Heinlein
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 01/07/2014 08:42 PM, Tobias Heinlein wrote:
5 > On 08.01.2014 02:40, Tobias Heinlein wrote:
6 >> Our new approach works more like a whitelist;
7 >
8 > "more like a blacklist", that is.
9 >
10 >
11 I kind of would like the workaround field to remain (but perhaps be
12 optional) since I have seen a few vulns that actually did have
13 functional workarounds. Not absolutely necessary.
14
15 Chris Reffett
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
18 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
19
20 iKYEARECAGYFAlLN6G9fFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
21 bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM2NzU5RjUyMDczREJDQkVDQTBDRkE1NERC
22 Nzk1QThBNDI2MTgzNTQACgkQ23laikJhg1T9+gCfUCZn/E5AZGvuX1od+rvJPsdH
23 ZR0AnR/sb6yPZpmiolxM0/HVQmnk3lng
24 =dm0O
25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies