1 |
> From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> |
2 |
|
3 |
>On Mar 21, 2012 4:23 PM, "Halassy Zoltán" <zhalassy@×××××××.hu> wrote: |
4 |
>>> IMO, initramfs adds yet another black box during server boot. |
5 |
>> The other way around, for me at least. I build my own initramfs, yet I don't know anything about mdev, just the fact it's part of busybox. So for me, mdev is a black box, while my initramfs definitely isn't. |
6 |
>I see. Well, different views for different people, I guess. |
7 |
>It's easier for me to bypass mdev (if it's b0rken) than to bypass initramfs. |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
As I've had to use BusyBox extensively in some environments, I find their tools very lacking in comparison to non-BusyBox environments. |
11 |
As such, I've come to really hate mdev, and I'll keep udev around for as long as it is the "standard" or until that "standard" changes to something better - of which, mdev it will not be. |
12 |
|
13 |
$0.02 |
14 |
|
15 |
Ben |