| 1 |
Sorry, it wasn't directed at you in particular. I use bind as well for |
| 2 |
some services. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 9/7/07, Christian Parpart <trapni@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Friday 07 September 2007 01:17:29 Peter Abrahamsen wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Sorry this is unsolicited, but-- |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > If anyone is looking for a solid, secure alternative to bind, check |
| 9 |
> > out nsd. It aims to be equivalent to bind on the wire, and reads bind |
| 10 |
> > zone files. There's an ebuild in bug 128246. I've been pretty happy |
| 11 |
> > with it for the last 6 months or so. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/ |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > If we can get some more people using it, maybe it'll finally be |
| 16 |
> > accepted into portage. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Cheers, |
| 19 |
> > Peter |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> you should probabely make a slashdot announcement, as this is by far not |
| 22 |
> helpfull, however. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> when i ask for a solution on annoying log entries, you can't cant recomment me |
| 25 |
> to use a different software - this is ridiculous. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Best regards, |
| 28 |
> Christian parpart. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
Archives