1 |
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 04:43, Eric Sammer wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> As for IPsec and that sort of fun stuff, OpenSwan (was FreeSwan) seems |
4 |
> to be one of the better options. It will do all manners of IPsec magic |
5 |
> but I don't know what clients will work (at least not first hand). If I |
6 |
> recall, IPsec is universal and most if not all clients should work in |
7 |
> some capacity, but certainly don't quote me on that. |
8 |
|
9 |
AFAIK the used crypto algorithm is one of the important thinks you to need |
10 |
look at for the client, not all support the same algos. |
11 |
|
12 |
But the kernel 2.6 IPSEC is a good option, too. Works without problems here |
13 |
with racoon, though it doesn't support nat-traversal, yet. |
14 |
|
15 |
Jens |