1 |
Hi! |
2 |
|
3 |
Another mail said that the kernel cannot be placed to a RAID5 array, |
4 |
only to a RAID1 array, so who's right? Or did I got something wrong? |
5 |
|
6 |
Marton Gabor |
7 |
<gabor.marton@××××××××××.hu>,<ICQ UIN: 169394884>,<T: +36 30 447-2042> |
8 |
VE-MIK |
9 |
VeHoK informatikai megbizott |
10 |
informatika-l adminisztrator |
11 |
informatika-lev adminisztrator |
12 |
bsc-info adminisztrator |
13 |
gazdinfo adminisztrator |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
xyon wrote: |
18 |
|
19 |
>(4 X 250GB ) - (1 X 250GB) = 750GB without hotspare. Although having a |
20 |
>hot-spare may be worth it. |
21 |
> |
22 |
>You should be able to RAID-5 /boot and all other partitions (minus swap, |
23 |
>of course). As long as the RAID modules are built into the kernel and you |
24 |
>have a functional raid config, you should be good. |
25 |
> |
26 |
>On Thu, March 2, 2006 11:19, Marton Gabor wrote: |
27 |
> |
28 |
> |
29 |
>>Hi! |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>>Thank you all for the fast replies, you helped me a lot. Unfortunately |
32 |
>>we cannot afford a HW RAID card, so I have to make it with software RAID. |
33 |
>>Now I have the idea to use RAID5 and if I get the picure rigth I need |
34 |
>>let's say a ~100MB /boot in RAID1, 512MB swap not in RAID on every disk, |
35 |
>>and I can build a RAID5 from the rest of the storage space, and will be |
36 |
>>able to use 750GB-(/boot*4)-(swap*4) and the 4th HD will store the |
37 |
>>so-called parity information. |
38 |
>> |
39 |
>>Marton Gabor |
40 |
>><gabor.marton@××××××××××.hu>,<ICQ UIN: 169394884>,<T: +36 30 447-2042> |
41 |
>>VE-MIK |
42 |
>>VeHoK informatikai megbizott |
43 |
>>informatika-l adminisztrator |
44 |
>>informatika-lev adminisztrator |
45 |
>>bsc-info adminisztrator |
46 |
>>gazdinfo adminisztrator |
47 |
>> |
48 |
>> |
49 |
>> |
50 |
>>-- |
51 |
>>gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
52 |
>> |
53 |
>> |
54 |
>> |
55 |
>> |
56 |
> |
57 |
> |
58 |
> |
59 |
> |
60 |
|
61 |
-- |
62 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |