| 1 |
I run about 20 low-ish traffic lists. Roughtly 5000 messages a day total. I use mailman currently, and have been since 1x. It's gotten a hell of a lot faster & easier to manage (just do it all from the browser). |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Good archives to boot. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Matt |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:48:14 -0400 |
| 9 |
Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o> wrote: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:15:23PM -0500 or thereabouts, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: |
| 12 |
> > I am interested to know what those legacy reasons for not using Mailman are? |
| 13 |
> > Mailman performs significantly better under large volume since version 2.1 |
| 14 |
> > was released (and it seems to suffice for the large volume FreeBSD lists ... |
| 15 |
> > which have been migrated from majordomo). |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> "legacy reasons" translates to "before my time, so I don't really know". :) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I'll do some research into our reasons behind switching from mailman to |
| 20 |
> ezmlm-idx in the first place. In the mean time, I'd still very much like |
| 21 |
> to hear what everone uses for mailing list software. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> --kurt |
| 24 |
> |
Archives