| 1 |
radu herinean wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> quoting myself: " pure-ftpd has plenty of other features you might not |
| 4 |
> need but still find usefull for the feature: virtual users, |
| 5 |
> authentication against mysql, secure login in various modes, etc, etc" :) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> i guess it comes between these two, you should read more in the forums |
| 8 |
> and decide for yourself based on YOUR needs. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> i am running pure myself but i have no experience with others, as pure |
| 11 |
> has served me very well so far. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> good luck |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bastian Balthazar Bux" |
| 16 |
> <BastianBalthazarBux@×××××××××.it> |
| 17 |
> To: <gentoo-server@l.g.o> |
| 18 |
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:43 PM |
| 19 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] ftp server recommendations |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
>> Covington, Chris wrote: |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>>> Hi all, |
| 25 |
>>> |
| 26 |
>>> I'm looking for a secure, fast FTP server to authenticate against an |
| 27 |
>>> LDAP backend. I've narrowed it down to these from portage: |
| 28 |
>>> |
| 29 |
>>> vsftpd |
| 30 |
>>> pure-ftpd |
| 31 |
>>> proftpd |
| 32 |
>>> |
| 33 |
>>> Can anyone recommend one over the other? |
| 34 |
>>> |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
>> Quoting www.kernel.org |
| 37 |
>> |
| 38 |
>> |May 26, 2004: vsftpd is now serving ftp... We should have done this |
| 39 |
>> | sooner... |
| 40 |
>> |
| 41 |
>> ;) |
| 42 |
>> -- |
| 43 |
>> gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
| 44 |
>> |
| 45 |
>> |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
Another vote for pure. |
| 48 |
http://www.pureftpd.org/ |
| 49 |
-- |
| 50 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
Archives