Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Ben Munat <bent@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] apache static modules
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:27:47
Message-Id: DD7A1B7B-1030-4D3D-B17C-58E63DC3707D@munat.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] apache static modules by "Benedikt Böhm"
1 There aren't any config changes between 2.2.6 and 2.2.8 right? Google
2 isn't finding me anything....
3
4 Ben
5
6
7 On Feb 2, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
8
9 > On Saturday 02 February 2008 18:43:05 Julian Golderer wrote:
10 >> hello sysadmins :)
11 >>
12 >> is there a performance difference in apache between static and
13 >> dynamic
14 >> linked modules?
15 >
16 > yes, there is, static modules generally make apache faster
17 >
18 >> since there is no 'apache-builtin-mods'-file anymore,
19 >> all modules have to be either static or dynamic - am i right?
20 >
21 > correct
22 >
23 >> why they removed the modules-file?
24 >
25 > because it breaks binary packages and portage will overwrite it on
26 > every
27 > update, as outlined at [1]
28 >
29 >> greets,
30 >> julian
31 >
32 > HTH,
33 > Bene
34 >
35 > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/apache-upgrading.xml#doc_chap1
36
37 --
38 gentoo-server@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-server] apache static modules "Benedikt Böhm" <hollow@g.o>