| 1 |
On 12/02/2004, at 9:00 PM, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 2 |
> So, I don't object to the idea of multiple baselines, but if your |
| 3 |
> expectation is that security fixes will be backported to them, then I'd |
| 4 |
> object to that. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
No expectation of that happening. I'm thinking more along the lines of |
| 7 |
each baseline tracking the stable releases of packages, ceasing to be |
| 8 |
updated when those packages have their final releases. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Eg, baseline 2003.4 might have been tracking Gimp 1.2 when it was |
| 11 |
current, therefore it will never go to Gimp 1.3 or Gimp 1.4, only to |
| 12 |
the very last release of Gimp 1.2. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
steve@×××××××××××××××.au |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
CRICOS Provider Number 00123M |
| 18 |
------------------------------------------------ |
| 19 |
This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) |
| 20 |
and contains information that may be confidential and/or |
| 21 |
copyright. If you are not the intended recipient please |
| 22 |
notify the sender by reply email and immediately delete |
| 23 |
this email. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this email |
| 24 |
by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly |
| 25 |
prohibited. No representation is made that this email or |
| 26 |
any attachments are free of viruses. Virus scanning is |
| 27 |
recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient. |
Archives