Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Andy Dustman <adustman@×××××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Re: requirements for a more stable portage tree
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:50:17
Message-Id: 40336D90.90301@terry.uga.edu
In Reply to: [gentoo-server] Re: requirements for a more stable portage tree by Jerry McBride
1 Jerry McBride wrote:
2
3 > Portage SHOULD have a database backend. MySql would be perfect. In the name
4 > of performance, at least have a second look at this.
5
6 I don't think mandating any relational database as a pre-requisite to
7 Portage is a good idea, unless you implement it in such a way that you
8 have it as a pluggable backend, i.e. you can stick with the current
9 filesystem method, or bdb, or MySQL, or PostgreSQL, or whatever.
10
11 There are some plusses to having the database backend: Centralized tree,
12 and fast queries. Downside: Extra complexity, and how often do you need
13 to query the tree anyway?
14
15 And yes, this is my project:
16
17 http://sourceforge.net/projects/mysql-python
18 a.k.a. dev-python/mysql-python
19 --
20 Andy Dustman <adustman@×××××××××.edu>
21 Office of Information Technology, Terry College of Business, UGA

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-server] Re: Re: requirements for a more stable portage tree Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@×××××××.net>