Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: "Petteri Räty" <petteri.raty@××××××××××.fi>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Stable Portage tree
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:11:17
Message-Id: 43398A0D.2030907@saunalahti.fi
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] Stable Portage tree by Ben Munat
1 Ben Munat wrote:
2 > Just to throw my two-devil's-advocate-cents in here, I maintain a gentoo
3 > server and -- though I certainly appreciate getting well-tested,
4 > problem-free updates -- I think the biggest problem gentoo faces is how
5 > far behind the curve it is. It's just plain embarassing that there are
6 > still no (unmasked) versions of PHP5, MySQL4.1 or 5, or Java 5/Tomcat
7 > 5.5 in portage... all of which have been freely available for over a year.
8 >
9
10 I now that for example Debian and Fedore do not support sun-jdk at all
11 because they can offer only free as in freedom software. The free java
12 is still months or years away from supporting 1.4. Tomcat 5.5 of course
13 is something that we should get to the main tree. It has been sitting in
14 the java experimental tree for quite a while. One of the reasons Tomcat
15 5.5 has not progressed is that our Tomcat maintainer disappeared a while
16 ago. I think Debian only recently added Tomcat 4 to main or something
17 like that.
18
19 >
20 > Like I say, just my .02...
21 >
22 > Ben
23
24 Regards,
25 Petteri Räty

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature