| 1 |
Why not vsftpd? I always preferred proftpd until I discovered vsftpd. |
| 2 |
It's incredibly secure for an ftp server, very fast, and easily |
| 3 |
configurable with so many options. I especially like the ease and |
| 4 |
flexibility with which you can configure bandwidth limitations. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Vern |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
-----Original Message----- |
| 10 |
From: Ian P. Christian [mailto:pookey@×××××××××.uk] |
| 11 |
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 2:14 PM |
| 12 |
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o |
| 13 |
Cc: Covington, Chris |
| 14 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] ftp server recommendations |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 20:11, Covington, Chris wrote: |
| 17 |
> pure-ftpd |
| 18 |
> proftpd |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Can anyone recommend one over the other? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I've recently moved from proftpd to pure-ftpd, because pure-ftpd offers |
| 23 |
a |
| 24 |
virtual chroot feature, which I find very useful. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Ian P. Christian ~ http://pookey.co.uk |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
Archives