1 |
Lance Albertson wrote: |
2 |
> Actually, that is the intended outcome since a virtual/httpd does not |
3 |
> exist yet. If neither of the use flags are set, its next choice is |
4 |
> lighthttpd. One of the limitations/hacks I had to do in the ebuild |
5 |
> because of the lack of the virtual. If you feel it should be different, |
6 |
> please file a bug in bugzilla and I'll take a look at it :-). |
7 |
> |
8 |
|
9 |
Hard to say. I don't consider that behavior broken, just different than |
10 |
what I've grown to depend on. Also IIRC there was an explicit lack of |
11 |
apache1 USE variables when apache2 was introduced which is why I ran |
12 |
into the problem now. To get things to work the way they used to would |
13 |
be to require apache2 and lighthttpd flags and assume apache1 in the |
14 |
absence of either, but that seems retarded on some level. |
15 |
|
16 |
In any case I added apache1 to my USE and am none the worse for the wear. |
17 |
|
18 |
However any server profile won't be written in stone either and will |
19 |
need to be changed as Gentoo changes. Personally I don't see much point |
20 |
in creating a server profile that's too general to useful. I'd rather |
21 |
spend time creating some documentation about setting up servers in |
22 |
general. Something like. |
23 |
|
24 |
arping, curl, fping, nmap, netcat, tcpdump, traceroute, tcptraceroute, |
25 |
telnet-bsd, nessus, nikto |
26 |
These same tools might not be such a good idea on a public server. Or |
27 |
maybe it's not worth the hassle to deny an attacker an extra minute or |
28 |
two in uploading his own tools when you likely waster 3-4 hours a year |
29 |
of admin time by not having them. Or when an outage event occurs it is |
30 |
worth the 2-3 minutes you'd save by having the right tools availible. |
31 |
|
32 |
I think we can all argue the nuts and bolts forever, but some framework |
33 |
for building your own might be more interesting. In full disclosure I've |
34 |
rolled out 20 new servers in the last couple of months so I've got my |
35 |
server profile pretty much refined... for me personally. Looking through |
36 |
this thread I'd say that anyone using mine is only going to be happy 50% |
37 |
of the time... in which case they should probably build their own. :) |
38 |
|
39 |
kashani |
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |