Archives
Archives
| From: | "A. Khattri" <ajai@××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-server@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-server] It's amazing what switching the IO scheduler can do. | ||
| Date: | Fri, 05 Aug 2005 22:19:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | Pine.BSO.4.58.0508051813120.17873@ida.bway.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-server] It's amazing what switching the IO scheduler can do. by David Miller |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, David Miller wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > My solution: |
| 4 | > The solution seems to be CFQ IO scheduling. I had previously used |
| 5 | > Deadline and the Anticipatory scheduler but neither of these solved |
| 6 | > the problem. CFQ seems to keep everything happy even under a mixed |
| 7 | > I/O load of multiple writes (35mb/s or so) and multiple I/O reads |
| 8 | > (70mb/s or so). The server load is still high in the 12 to 14 range |
| 9 | > but the server and it's services seem to be much more stable. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | I had a (dumb?) question: if you enable all the schedulers in a 2.6 |
| 12 | kernel, which one is picked as the default? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-server] It's amazing what switching the IO scheduler can do. | "Paul Kölle" <pkoelle@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-server] It's amazing what switching the IO scheduler can do. | Eduardo Tongson <propolice@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-server] It's amazing what switching the IO scheduler can do. | Kerin Millar <kerframil@×××××.com> |