1 |
I did do some upgrading the other day... forget what now. But, just to be safe, I emerge |
2 |
rkhunter and ran it... came up clean. Hell, I probably restarted a daemon or two in the |
3 |
last few days. I would feel more comfortable knowing exactly what printed that to the log, |
4 |
but I'm not going to sweat it too much. |
5 |
|
6 |
b |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
Lance Lassetter wrote: |
10 |
> Ouch, I'm not the one with this problem but would something like |
11 |
> rkhunter which is recommended to be used by the -hardened team pick up |
12 |
> something like this? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I run with standard with 'rkhunter -c' do I need to specify other |
15 |
> options with rkhunter? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Thanks, |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Lance(stuNNed) |
20 |
> |
21 |
> On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:52 -0500, Wes Kurdziolek wrote: |
22 |
> |
23 |
>>When you upgrade certain packages, part of their post-install is to tell |
24 |
>>init to restart b/c it or its configuration has changed. However, if |
25 |
>>you haven't upgraded any of these packages (off the top of my head, I'm |
26 |
>>not sure which, but I'd guess sysvinit would be a good start) it could |
27 |
>>be a sign of someone installing a trojan init. |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>>On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 10:08 -0800, Ben Munat wrote: |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>>>Anyone know why this: |
32 |
>>> |
33 |
>>>init: Trying to re-exec init |
34 |
>>> |
35 |
>>>would show up in my logs? |
36 |
>>> |
37 |
>>>Ben |
38 |
>>>-- |
39 |
>>>gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
40 |
>>> |
41 |
>> |
42 |
>>-- |
43 |
>>gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
> -- |
47 |
> gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |
48 |
> |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
gentoo-server@g.o mailing list |