| 1 |
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 05:12, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:00:11PM -0500 or thereabouts, Jonathan S. Romero wrote: |
| 3 |
> > What's wrong with WOLK, it seems to work fine on one of my servers. Is there |
| 4 |
> > an issue with it that I was not aware of? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> 4.9s works fine, but it's getting a bit long in the tooth. WOLK has been |
| 7 |
> all-but-unmaintained for a few months now, so there is concern that there |
| 8 |
> will never be a new release of WOLK. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I've had somewhat negative results with WOLK. On a Dell SMP box with |
| 11 |
hardware RAID, it did not work very well at all. (In contrast, |
| 12 |
development-sources has worked perfectly.) On two other Dell single CPU |
| 13 |
boxes, it ran fine for several months and then both machines crashed |
| 14 |
yesterday, so I'm probably going back to vanilla-sources as soon as I |
| 15 |
can. |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Andy Dustman <adustman@×××××××××.edu> |
| 18 |
Office of Information Technology, Terry College of Business, UGA |
Archives