Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: "W.Kenworthy" <billk@×××××××××.au>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] prioritising security updates
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 06:50:34
Message-Id: 1126075689.8496.166.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-server] prioritising security updates by Michael Irey
1 or to reduce bandwidth try this as the crontab command:
2
3 rsync --recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress
4 --force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180
5 rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage/metadata/glsa/* /usr/portage/metadata/glsa/ ;glsa-check -n -l|grep "\[N"
6
7 This syncs only the glsa metadata, and the cron email also shows updates
8 that it has synced, but do not apply to your system. However, when you
9 do a glsa -f package to apply the fix, you must first "emerge sync" to
10 update the full tree. As glsa's that affect my systems are few and far
11 between, there's quite a bandwidth saving.
12
13 e.g.,
14
15 ___________________
16 ...
17
18 MOTD brought to you by motd-o-matic, version 0.3
19
20 receiving file list ... done
21 glsa-200509-03.xml
22 timestamp.chk
23
24 Number of files: 539
25 Number of files transferred: 2
26 Total file size: 1406439 bytes
27 Total transferred file size: 2153 bytes
28 Literal data: 2153 bytes
29 Matched data: 0 bytes
30 File list size: 8682
31 Total bytes written: 199
32 Total bytes read: 11353
33
34 wrote 199 bytes read 11353 bytes 2100.36 bytes/sec
35 total size is 1406439 speedup is 121.75
36 WARNING: This tool is completely new and not very tested, so it should
37 not be
38 used on production systems. It's mainly a test tool for the new GLSA
39 release
40 and distribution system, it's functionality will later be merged into
41 emerge
42 and equery.
43 Please read http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/glsa-integration.xml
44 before using this tool AND before reporting a bug.
45
46 [N] indicates that the system might be affected.
47
48
49 ___________________
50 In the above case, a new glsa (glsa-200509-03) has been issued, but it
51 doesnt apply. On my todo list is to filter and summarize so all I get
52 is whats new, and what applies to me!
53
54 BillK
55
56
57 On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 23:12 -0700, Michael Irey wrote:
58 > To make it easy I have added these 2 lines to my crontab
59 >
60 > 10 2 * * * /usr/bin/emerge --sync 2> /dev/null
61 > > /root/tmp/daily-emerge-sync.txt
62 > 50 2 * * * /usr/bin/glsa-check -ln 2> /dev/null | grep ' \[N\]'
63 >
64 > Then every morning I get an email if there are packages with vulnerabilities.
65 >
66 > I can decide manually the priority. Because I dont want apache updating
67 > itself in the middle of the night... I do it manually, from my emailed list.
68 >
69 >
70 > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 02:53 pm, Jeremy Brake wrote:
71 > > Hey,
72 > >
73 > > Is there anything in Portage which will allow me to view security
74 > > updates, seperate from general version updates?
75 > > At the moment i have a 5am cron job which runs "emerge --sync && emerge
76 > > -upvD world" , and i just glance at it as soon as I i sit down at my pc
77 > > for the day.
78 > > The problem here is that I cant tell if updates (eg, at the moment it
79 > > wants to update openssh and apache2) are security patches, or just
80 > > general version upgrades.
81 > >
82 > > I know i can use "system" instead of "world" and omit the -D option, but
83 > > thats not targeting my issue exactly. Is there a way to see which
84 > > updates are security patches, without having to manually trawl through
85 > > webpages and changelogs?
86 > >
87 > > Jeremy
88 --
89 gentoo-server@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-server] prioritising security updates Matthias Bethke <Matthias.Bethke@×××.net>