Gentoo Archives: gentoo-server

From: Brian Kroth <bpkroth@××××.edu>
To: gentoo-server@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Re: SAN Clustered Filesystem
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 16:07:13
Message-Id: 45C60407.2000409@wisc.edu
In Reply to: [gentoo-server] Re: SAN Clustered Filesystem by Kevin
1 Yeah, thanks everyone for your responses. I'll most likely be testing a
2 bunch of these in the coming weeks and months to find the one I think
3 works the best. I'll try and post some results when I'm done. So far
4 just from the reading I think my best bets are Lustre, GFS, and OCFS2.
5 The cluster list also had some mention about GlusterFS that I'm curious
6 about.
7
8 Also, I did some more research on the MySQL end of things and have
9 decided that replication is the way to go. Thanks Hanni for that nice
10 graphic.
11
12 Brian
13
14 Kevin wrote:
15 > Brian Kroth wrote:
16 >> Hello all,
17 >>
18 >> I currently manage about 40 Window, OSX, and Hardened Gentoo servers. I
19 >> will soon have 12 P4 servers that were previously used as video encoders
20 >> free as well as an Apple XRaid. With all this spare hardware I thought
21 >> I'd research setting up a cluster of servers running Apache for load
22 >> balancing and high availability. I'm also looking into a MySQL cluster,
23 >> but that wouldn't require a shared filesystem. I'm wondering if anyone
24 >> has done something like this before and in particular knows a good
25 >> filesystem to use so that each of the servers can access and potentially
26 >> write to the same storage array. I've accomplished the same thing with
27 >> XServes running OSX, but they like to charge you a pretty penny for the
28 >> XSan software that allows this which I thought I'd try to avoid if
29 >> possible. So far I've seen only GFS, but haven't gotten much reading
30 >> done on it yet. Any other tips or insights would be appreciated as well.
31 >>
32 >> Thanks,
33 >> Brian
34 >
35 > You may want to consider OpenAFS: http://www.openafs.org/
36 >
37 > Not really sure if this is what you're after or not, but since there have
38 > been several ideas mentioned in this thread in response to your post
39 > already, I thought I'd mention it in case you're not aware of it.
40 >
41 > HTH.
42 >
43 > -Kevin
44 --
45 gentoo-server@g.o mailing list