1 |
Anthony, |
2 |
|
3 |
I'm currently testing Bacula. I started with Amanda (it seems to be |
4 |
the venerable one in the area) but the documentation and configuration |
5 |
file format made me quit by now. Other things that I don't like in |
6 |
Amanda but Bacula has are native support for backups to file system and |
7 |
possibility of using more than one tape per backup or more than one |
8 |
backup per tape. Bacula documentation is much better (I'm reading it |
9 |
right now) and the configuration file format is very natural and |
10 |
readable. From what I've read and tried it seems to comply with |
11 |
(almost?) all my requisites. Would you mind answering just two questions? |
12 |
|
13 |
First of all, I like a lot the modular approach of Bacula, so I can |
14 |
have the services spread over my network communicating among them. What |
15 |
about network traffic? I guess file daemons must send all the data to be |
16 |
backed up to the storage daemon over the wire. Don't you notice network |
17 |
slowdowns? Could you give me stimates of backup time based on size of |
18 |
backup from some of your installations? |
19 |
|
20 |
What about backups of file systems containing mail or database |
21 |
servers? What is your exeprience here? |
22 |
|
23 |
Thanks a lot, best regards |
24 |
Jose |
25 |
|
26 |
Anthony Dodson wrote: |
27 |
|
28 |
>We use Bacula at three different sites, with three different DLT-based |
29 |
>autochangers. We are very happy with the software as well as the |
30 |
>responsiveness of the development community. Our most complex site has |
31 |
>Bacula running on a server connected to a 4-drive, 48-slot autochanger. |
32 |
>Bacula handles multiple simultaneous backups to the same drive, as well as |
33 |
>control of the robot for swapping out tapes for all 4 drives. It allows |
34 |
>(currently 3) choices for your media database, PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite. |
35 |
> |
36 |
>I have no experience with the others you mention. |
37 |
> |
38 |
>Good luck... and let us know what you choose and why... |
39 |
> |
40 |
>Anthony |
41 |
> |
42 |
>-----Original Message----- |
43 |
>From: Jose Gonzalez Gomez [mailto:jgonzalez@×××××××××××.com] |
44 |
>Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 12:49 PM |
45 |
>To: gentoo-server@l.g.o |
46 |
>Subject: [gentoo-server] Backup software |
47 |
> |
48 |
> |
49 |
> |
50 |
> Hi there, |
51 |
> |
52 |
> I sent this to the gentoo-user list without much success, I hope in |
53 |
>the server list there are more people doing backups... you know what |
54 |
>they say: "there are only two kind of people: those doing backups and |
55 |
>those that never lost any data". I hope I become one of the third kind, |
56 |
>those that never lost any data but are doing backups :o) |
57 |
> |
58 |
> I'm searching for some backup software with the following requirements: |
59 |
> |
60 |
> * Capability to scale from a single machine to backups of full |
61 |
>networks, including heterogeneous OS (Linux, Windows,...) |
62 |
> * Capability to do full or incremental backups |
63 |
> * Network friendly (don't wanna have my network down because the |
64 |
>backup traffic ate all the bandwidth) |
65 |
> * Possibility of using different backup media (tape, CD, DVD, HD,...) |
66 |
> * Ease of maintenance and recovery, preferably with unattended |
67 |
> operation (don't wanna be hanging around changing tapes) |
68 |
> * Snapshot backups of live file systems (don't wanna have to stop my |
69 |
> web/mail/database server to do the backup) |
70 |
> * Ready to go (so please, don't tell me to use tar / cpio / mt) |
71 |
> * Of course open source |
72 |
> |
73 |
> After a preliminary search, I've found Amanda, Mondo Rescue and |
74 |
>Bacula, all of them in portage. I would like to hear experiences, and |
75 |
>thoughts about this. |
76 |
> |
77 |
> Thanks in advance, best regards |
78 |
> Jose |
79 |
> |
80 |
>IMPORTANT WARNING: |
81 |
>This e-mail is intended for the use of the person to whom it is addressed |
82 |
>and may contain information that is privileged and confidential, the |
83 |
>disclosure of which is governed by applicable law. Dissemination, |
84 |
>distribution or copying of this information in an unauthorized manner is |
85 |
>strictly prohibited. Sender accepts no liability for any damage caused by |
86 |
>any virus transmitted by this e-mail. If you receive this in error, please |
87 |
>notify the sender. |
88 |
> |
89 |
> |
90 |
> |