1 |
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 08:54:19PM -0400 or thereabouts, Eric Sammer wrote: |
2 |
> (At the risk of making waves and upsetting people for making more work, |
3 |
> I will say the following... If this is something that is important to |
4 |
> you and how you use Gentoo (or would like to), I urge you to read GLEP |
5 |
> 19 and make some noise about this. The more users (and devs) that are |
6 |
> interested in such a feature, the more likely such a feature will be |
7 |
> worked on.) |
8 |
|
9 |
While Eric is right, making noise is only half of the problem. Getting |
10 |
enough people actually willing to invest their time and knowledge is the |
11 |
other half. |
12 |
|
13 |
GLEP 19 was originally tabled for various reasons, some of which Eric |
14 |
mentioned already. Gentoo is obviously undergoing some significant |
15 |
organizational changes at the moment, but once things have settled down a |
16 |
bit, I plan to reintroduce the GLEP and try to get it implemented. |
17 |
|
18 |
One blocker we are likely to hit is getting anything into portage. That |
19 |
team has a lot of stuff on their plates already, so their input queue tends |
20 |
to be quite full. :) |
21 |
|
22 |
Thus, if you are interested in seeing this stuff implemented, are an expert |
23 |
python coder (or at least an expert coder in some other language and |
24 |
willing to learn python) and willing to delve into portage to produce |
25 |
patches, you will significantly increase our chances of getting this done |
26 |
in a timely fashion. (I really want to stress the expert part of that last |
27 |
sentence. The portage team tends to reject crappy code and/or coders and |
28 |
for good reason. Learning python may be fairly easy. Learning how to |
29 |
write quality code isn't, however.) |
30 |
|
31 |
--kurt |