From: | "Halassy Zoltán" <zhalassy@×××××××.hu> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-server@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-server] udev or mdev? | ||
Date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:06:18 | ||
Message-Id: | 4F699DC3.6030805@loginet.hu | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-server] udev or mdev? by Pandu Poluan |
1 | > IMO, initramfs adds yet another black box during server boot. |
2 | |
3 | The other way around, for me at least. I build my own initramfs, yet I |
4 | don't know anything about mdev, just the fact it's part of busybox. So |
5 | for me, mdev is a black box, while my initramfs definitely isn't. |
6 | |
7 | > And yet |
8 | > another daemon in memory, something I certainly don't need on my static |
9 | > virtualized servers. |
10 | |
11 | I agree with that. But why do you need mdev for a static system? A few |
12 | mknods would suffice. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
smime.p7s | application/pkcs7-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-server] udev or mdev? | Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> |